While you do get a lot for your money, including tons of storage and a screen you won't find on any other phone, the whole experience just isn't polished enough to make you feel good about spending so much. I don't quite care for this sort of effect, but the real problem is occasional distortion from the phone's front-facing stereo speakers even with A3D disabled.Ī $1,300 price tag is going to be tough to stomach no matter how good a phone is. The Hydrogen One really tries to emphasize its A3D Sound processing, intending to broaden the audio stage. Snapdragon 835? Though the phone is still plenty capable, it's tricky to rationalize last-gen silicon on a model that costs so very, very much. We're nearly at the tail end of 2018, and here's a flagship device launching with a. We also get some backlight bleed on the top and bottom edges. And here, there's a tiny grid of dots visible at all times - especially so on white backgrounds. While the 3D bit is interesting, and I can overlook some of the technical issues directly tied to that effect, it's harder to forgive the impact this system has on regular, 2D viewing. It's certainly a very unique device, but also a confusing one, and despite carrier interest, one that's going to have a pretty tough time appealing to shoppers.ġ28GB / 256GB, microSD expansion availableĥ.7” autostereoscopic 4-View LCD 2560x1440 (515ppi) Would this bizarre-sounding phone ever make it off the drawing board? Could all those odd features possibly deliver? Over a year later, I've finally got my hands on the Hydrogen One, and have spent the past week putting it through its paces.
The design was unconventional, the price steep, the presence of a Moto-style expansion port surprising, and word of a 3D autostereoscopic display had us wondering if we'd slipped back six years into some sort of time warp. When we first heard of the RED Hydrogen One back in 2017, it was immediately clear this was going to be another of those "weird" phones. While mainstream models tend to keep things basic, giving you slightly faster and more feature-rich versions of devices that have come before, there are always those outliers that seem to remind us that there's room for variety in this industry yet: phones that fold, have sliding hardware, or take similar steps to set them apart from the rest of the pack. Due to the superiority of the Mn 4+-doped fluoride for the rapid imaging of LFPs in terms of low-cost, high compatibility and good availability, it is expected to be a promising candidate for forensic science as well as fluorescence imaging in other fields instead of rare earth luminescent materials.For as long as there have been smartphones, there have also been weird smartphones. To confirm the high selectivity of KAF:Mn 4+-OA for LFP imaging, an efficient quantitative evaluation method is proposed with the aid of ImageJ & Origin software. The well-defined ridge details with little background interference on various surfaces were presented by the oleic acid (OA) modified KAF:Mn 4+ (KAF:Mn 4+-OA) phosphor in few seconds using the powder dusting method. More importantly, this non-ultraviolet (UV) or non-near infrared (NIR) induced phosphor was proved to be an ideal fluorescent label for LFP imaging, which is both friendly for touch DNA analysis and compatible to forensic light sources.
The phosphor has a uniform and superfine morphology with excellent luminescence properties.
#RED HYDROGEN ONE FINGERPRINT HARDWARE NOT AVAILABLE SKIN#
To overcome this challenge, a moisture-stable, red-emitting fluoride phosphor K 3AlF 6:Mn 4+ (KAF:Mn 4+) with an organic hydrophobic skin was prepared. The demand for in-situ detection of latent fingerprints (LFPs) in ways of high sensitivity, high selectivity, high contrast, low cost and user-friendly is still urgent.